Lansing — Michigan’s Republican-led Senate on Tuesday unveiled and quickly approved a sweeping no-fault auto insurance reform plan supporters say could significantly reduce rates that rank among the highest in the nation.
The proposal would end a long-standing requirement that Michigan auto insurance policies guarantee unlimited lifetime medical coverage for injured motorists. It would also mandate lower reimbursement rates for hospitals and other medical providers.
Most Democrats voted against the plan because it would not force insurers to cut premiums or prohibit them from using non–driving factors such as IP codes to set rates, a practice critics contend contributes to sky-high rates in cities like Detroit. Under the proposal, insurers could still offer policies with unlimited medical coverage, but they’d be unlikely to do so because the state would end liability for and eventually dissolve the reinsurance program that helps pay the most expensive claims.
Instead, drivers with private or public health insurance plans that cover vehicle accident injuries could choose to waive any personal injury protection in their auto plan.Motorists could also choose auto plans with as little as $50,000 in personal injury protection that would also cover up to $200,000 for immediate hospital needs. Another option would include up to $250,000 of personal injury protection.
The legislation would empower Michigan residents “to choose the level of coverage that fits their budget and their needs, instead of having the state dictate to them what level of coverage they are required to have,” said sponsoring Sen. Aric Nesbitt, R-Lawton.
The current system is in a “death spiral,” he said, with higher rates make it increasingly impossible for residents to afford required auto insurance, and fewer insured motorists leading to higher rates.
Nesbitt estimates residents with health insurance could save up to 46% by opting out of personal injury protection coverage on their auto policies. Motorists who choose auto policies with $250,000 in medical coverage could save at least 15% over unlimited plans, he said.
At the least, motorists would save an estimated $180 in annual Michigan Catastrophic Clams Association fee reductions. The fee, set to rise to $220 in July, would instead be reduced to roughly $40 when the reinsurance program is effectively closed to future claims, according to Senate Republicans.
But Democrats blasted the proposal for failing to mandate insurer rate reductions. The GOP majority rejected an amendment proposed by Sen. Erika Geiss, D-Taylor, that would have mandated insurers pass along savings to motorists by cutting premiums at least 50%.
Republicans are “simply guessing” about the impact on motorists and “made up” the savings estimates they cited Tuesday, Senate Minority Leader Jim Ananich, D-Flint, told reporters after the vote.
“There’s an old saying… ‘You can take a crap in one hand and hope in another and see which one fills up first,'” he said. “If you think the insurance companies are going to give you rate reductions, we wanted to mandate it today.” The proposal passed the Senate in a 24-14 vote and now heads to the Republican-led House, where a special committee on auto insurance rate reduction has also been exploring potential reforms.
“We are going to combine our findings with the Senate’s plan and use the ideas we believe create the best way forward for all Michigan drivers,” said Rep. Jason Wentworth, a Clare Republican who chairs the committee, in a statement.
While lawmakers debated potential reforms for months, Republicans unveiled the new plan in the Senate Insurance and Banking Committee shortly before a panel vote and roughly four hours before a floor vote in the full chamber. It gave the public and interested parties little time to digest details of the 79-page policy bill.
But the panel had already heard “many, many, many hours of testimony” over intent legislation introduced earlier this year, said Sen. Lana Theis, a Brighton Republican who chairs the committee.“The concepts have been reviewed over and over and over again,” she said, referencing proposals from past sessions. The vast majority of voters she talked to on the campaign trail in 2018 wanted immediate action to cut premiums, she added.
“They said, ‘We’re done. We’re hurting. Please fix this.'”Geiss, the ranking Democrat on the Senate committee, criticized the quick action on a proposal many lawmakers saw for the first time the previous night. “This is so meaty, and so weighty, and impacts every single driving Michigander, that we should not have rushed it like this,” she said. “It was completely irresponsible to do that, and not fair to our residents.”
The proposal seeks to control medical costs by creating a fee schedule for providers, who could only charge insurers at rates mandated under worker’s compensation. In-home attendant care by family members would be limited to 56 hours per week. The plan also attempts to curb what Nesbitt called “attorney lawsuit abuse” through measures that include tougher rules prohibiting attorneys from soliciting clients within 30 days of a crash. A second bill sponsored by Theis would require lawsuits involving auto injuries to be filed in the same county as the crash, an attempt to curb “venue shopping” by attorneys.
The legislation would require the Michigan Catastrophic Claims Association to provide a driver rebate, through insurers, if its assets cover more than 120 percent of liabilities. The MCCA imposes an annual fee passed on to motorists to reimburse insurers for unlimited medical expenses.
The proposal would create a new auto insurance task force under the Michigan State Police that would include the Department of Insurance and Financial Services and the Attorney General’s Office.
Sens. Adam Hollier and Sylvia Santana of Detroit broke ranks with other Democrats to vote for the reform plan, joining all 22 Republicans in support.
“The reality is the majority of people who I live near have already opted out because they aren’t buying auto insurance, can’t afford to buy auto insurance,” Hollier said in a floor speech, arguing the plan is not perfect but could provide relief.Republicans approved a Hollier amendment that would prohibit insurers from refusing or limiting coverage for consumers based on where they live. But the proposal did not ban pricing based on ZIP code, and Geiss called it a “hollow” attempt to address so-called redlining.
The GOP majority rejected an amendment by Sen. Marshall Bullock, D-Detroit, that would have linked the legislation to a separate plan that would prohibit insurers from using any non–driving factors to set rates. Sen. Ken Horn, R-Frankenmuth, voted for the reform plan and said he is concerned that high premiums are encouraging motorists to break the law by driving without coverage.
“If we do nothing, we will sentence these people to a lifetime of struggling without insurance from here to eternity,” he said.Reducing medical coverage guarantees for injured motorists would likely increase state Medicaid costs. The non-partisan Senate Fiscal Agency projects that in a decade annual Michigan Medicaid costs would be $65.9 million higher than they are now if the legislation were signed into law.
The plan could also cost the state up to $15 million a year in reduced revenue from an existing 1.25% insurance premium tax, according to the agency. “This is all about foisting the liability on the backs of insurance companies onto the back of the Medicaid program where people will get worse care and the taxpayers will fund it,” argued Sen.
Jeff Irwin, D-Ann Arbor.
A third bill advanced Tuesday morning would expand the state’s racketeering law to include insurance fraud. A pattern of insurance fraud for financial gain could be prosecuted as a 20-year felony, plus a fine of up to $100,000 and legal fees.
Yearly auto insurance premiums in Michigan average $2,693, the highest rate in the nation, according to 2019 rankings compiled by The Zebra, an insurance search engine and industry research firm. Detroit is the easily the most expensive city in the country for auto insurance, with rates more than double the state average.
Auto insurance rates are “unaffordable” by federal standards in 97%of all Michigan ZIP codes, according to a recent analysis by researchers at the University of Michigan. In Detroit, average premiums cost between 12% and 36% of residents’ pre-tax income in almost every ZIP code.
Lawmakers have debated auto insurance reforms for years, but past efforts have stalled amid intense fights involving the powerful insurance, hospital and trial lawyer lobbies.Senate Majority Leader Mike Shirkey, R-Clarklake, and House Speaker Lee Chatfield, R-Levering, have both called auto insurance reform a top priority this session. Michigan Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Rich Studley praised the Senate for taking “bold action to drive down Michigan’s highest-in-the-nation car insurance rates and reform the system to make Michigan more competitive with other
But Michigan Health and Hospitals Association CEO Brian Peterson called it a “shocking step back” for the reform debate. “Instead of holding insurers accountable for discriminatory rate setting and lowering rates, Senate Bill 1 limits coverage and asks drivers to simply trust the insurance companies,” Peters said in a statement. “Accident victims lose, drivers lose and healthcare providers lose.”
The Insurance Alliance of Michigan did not immediately respond to a request for comment but has generally supported personal injury protection “choice” proposals. The Coalition Protecting Auto No-Fault urged supporters to write their legislators ahead of Tuesday’s vote, arguing the
Senate GOP plan “would gut protections for auto accident survivors” and “amounts to a giveaway to the auto insurance industry.”